Celotex v edwards

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE …

911 F2d 1151 Edwards v. Armstrong World Industries Inc 2020-7-16 · 4. Celotex adroitly contends that Texas law would not impose liability for punitive damages upon it as a corporate successor to Philip Carey.1 In part, Celotex suggests, this result follows from state corporate law principles, but also and more importantly because penalizing Celotex for the sins of Philip Carey would disserve the state's twin goals of punishment and deterrence. Edwards v. Okie Dokie, Inc., 473 F. Supp. 2d 31 Opinion for Edwards v. Okie Dokie, Inc., 473 F. Supp. 2d 31 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

(2006); Celotex v. Edwards, 514 U.S. 300 (1995). 5 “bankruptcy judges may hear and determine … all core proceedings arising under title

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Anthony F. … 2002-2-9 · bankruptcy estate." Celotex v. Edwards, 514 U.S. 300, 308 n.5 (1995). The most common test for assessing "related to" jurisdiction asks whether the proceeding under examination "could conceivably have any effect on the estate" Id. at 308 n.6 (1995) (quoting Pacor, Inc. v… In re: CONSECO, INC., et al.; Banc of America Investment

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett . One of the most pernicious environmental toxins of the 20 th century was asbestos. Used in the insulation of countess buildings, asbestos provided fireproof barriers, but came at a high cost to human health. Once asbestos dust was in the air, the crystals hooked into the lungs of the workers who breathed it in.

2020-7-16 · 4. Celotex adroitly contends that Texas law would not impose liability for punitive damages upon it as a corporate successor to Philip Carey.1 In part, Celotex suggests, this result follows from state corporate law principles, but also and more importantly because penalizing Celotex for the sins of Philip Carey would disserve the state's twin goals of punishment and deterrence. Edwards v. Okie Dokie, Inc., 473 F. Supp. 2d 31